This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.
34382 Responseshttp://ns4w.org/playboy-babe-jessica-decarlo/Playboy+Babe+-+Jessica+DeCarlo2008-11-21+13%3A03%3A48admin to Playboy Babe – Jessica DeCarlo
This girl has a real nice body and an acceptable face: much better than many professional models. But, again, the PB photographers have missed the chance to enhance her beauty with good pictures: the setting is dull, most poses look innatural, lighting set is trivial and it seems that they keep eresing the model’s pussy making it innatural. In practice these photographers are very far from being considered good photographers. Check http://www.met-art.com as a benchmark for good nude photographs and you will see the difference.
Additionally, her fake tits don’t look right at all. Why do women who are small increase their size? It is alright to be small as long as it is natural. She went to a size way too large that makes her nipples look like mouse turds.
2 Responses to Playboy Babe – Jessica DeCarlo
P.
November 21st, 2008 at 9:51 am
This girl has a real nice body and an acceptable face: much better than many professional models. But, again, the PB photographers have missed the chance to enhance her beauty with good pictures: the setting is dull, most poses look innatural, lighting set is trivial and it seems that they keep eresing the model’s pussy making it innatural. In practice these photographers are very far from being considered good photographers. Check http://www.met-art.com as a benchmark for good nude photographs and you will see the difference.
IHateHim
November 21st, 2008 at 2:42 pm
Additionally, her fake tits don’t look right at all. Why do women who are small increase their size? It is alright to be small as long as it is natural. She went to a size way too large that makes her nipples look like mouse turds.